| 1 | Jun 29, 2009 9:32 PM | It seemed to me that the material presented gravitated toward those subjects of most interest to the presenter |
| 2 | Jun 30, 2009 12:53 AM | Please include more mathematical definitions for MDs. |
| 3 | Jun 30, 2009 6:19 AM | It's existence was good, but I didn't like the fact that it was on the same time with the Epilepsy for Engineers/Mathematicians/Physicists didactic course. Most interesting were the talks were the ones about Introduction to EEG, Altas of Epileptiform Activity. |
| 4 | Jun 30, 2009 8:44 AM | I would have liked to attend this, but was tied up with the other didactic course. I heard that it was too introspective to reach the target audience, but that most definitely is hearsay. |
| 5 | Jun 30, 2009 9:21 AM | more nonlinear dynamics! |
| 6 | Jun 30, 2009 9:29 AM | It was a pity that I could not attend this course. |
| 7 | Jun 30, 2009 11:36 AM | Did not attend |
| 8 | Jun 30, 2009 2:07 PM | See previous question. |
| 9 | Jun 30, 2009 5:28 PM | No, because I didn't attend. |
| 10 | Jun 30, 2009 5:37 PM | No, because I didn't attend. |
| 11 | Jun 30, 2009 8:00 PM | Too basic and the topics were too narrowly addressed, I thought. I'm not sure whether it was intended for a complete signal processing neophyte or a clinician with some experience in it - it was likely too advanced for the former, but too spotty for the latter. If it is intended for the neophyte I'd include some practical advice on software packages, a basic Matlab tutorial, and tutorial on filters. A good overview of basic quantitative EEG techniques including a description of the different basic measures (e.g. teager energy, FFT, wavelet spectra, coherence), what they are good for, when not to use them, pitfalls, etc, would have been very useful for either type of audience. Finally, a session on How to Handle Artifacts would be very nice to include. |
| 12 | Jul 1, 2009 5:44 PM | N/A |
| 13 | Jul 2, 2009 1:43 AM | Perhaps the didactic session should be joint and the speakers should be from labs in which MDs and engineers work closely together. It's more useful to see examples of how engineers and MDs can collaborate effectively. |
| 14 | Jul 6, 2009 9:47 AM | some presentations well done, in others I was missing the didactic aspect |
| 15 | Jul 6, 2009 8:34 PM | Did not attend. |
| 16 | Jul 8, 2009 12:28 PM | Excellent refresher course. |
| 17 | Jul 8, 2009 7:50 PM | it was nice |
| 18 | Jul 9, 2009 6:59 PM | did not attend |
| 19 | Jul 10, 2009 5:36 AM | How about a list of good textbooks on the subject including the author names, ISBN's, etc... |
| 20 | Jul 10, 2009 9:08 PM | same |
| 21 | Jul 12, 2009 5:38 PM | There were people that wanted to attend to both courses, but it was almost impossible without missing interesting topics. |
| 22 | Jul 22, 2009 2:05 PM | Very important. Should be continued. The material should be made available to the participants prior to the meeting. |
| 23 | Jul 24, 2009 5:10 PM | see above |
| 24 | Jul 24, 2009 6:04 PM | It seems like it missed the audience. Instead of epileptologists most audience members where engineers and physicist, and some of the talks were directed to such audience, others where to basic for this audience. |
| 25 | Jul 24, 2009 7:00 PM | More tutorial style talks |
| 26 | Jul 27, 2009 6:24 AM | Some of them are very well organized, some of them are not well prepared. |
| 27 | Jul 27, 2009 10:50 AM | I know it's difficult but some of the courses were too advanced. |
| 28 | Jul 28, 2009 11:10 PM | I was not able to attend this session as I chose the Epilepsy for Engineers session. At the cost of some redundancy, I recommend to schedule such sessions so that ALL can learn from both sessions. |