| 1 | Jun 29, 2009 7:50 PM | Afternoon, first day, the "engineers" session |
| 2 | Jun 29, 2009 7:51 PM | The State of Seizure Prediction: Seizure Prediction & Detection
because it covered the actual workshop topic (Seizure Prediction)
I also liked
The State of Seizure Prediction: Seizure Generation
because I think we need to better understand ictogenesis before we can predict seizures. |
| 3 | Jun 29, 2009 8:46 PM | I would also note that for whatever reasons, it was often the same people asking questions and making points throughout- Now this isn't a bad thing per se, and I valued the valid and useful opinions of established experts. But I wonder if there's a way to encourage a broader discussion..... |
| 4 | Jun 30, 2009 12:53 AM | Debates on Dynamical Issues. The debates were a good way to summarize the research discussed in previous talks. |
| 5 | Jun 30, 2009 6:19 AM | The State of Seizure Prediction: Seizure Prediction & Detection I,
The State of Seizure Prediction: Seizure Prediction & Detection II
just because those sessions were closer to my personal interests |
| 7 | Jun 30, 2009 9:29 AM | For me the didactic sessions because they give a good start to workshop. Everybody will be able to follow the rest of the talks at at least a certain level.
Also the poster sessions were very good, because I was able to meet other interesting researchers through their posters. |
| 8 | Jun 30, 2009 11:36 AM | Seizure Generation on Saturday June 6 morning; several presentations stimulated challenging issues. |
| 9 | Jun 30, 2009 5:28 PM | Didactic course of epilepsy for Non-MDs. |
| 10 | Jun 30, 2009 5:37 PM | Didactic course of epilepsy for Non-MDs. |
| 11 | Jun 30, 2009 8:00 PM | The research update sessions on seizure generation and control (hard to pick between them). |
| 12 | Jul 1, 2009 3:13 PM | Debates on Dynamical Issues. It was very interesting to hear the point of view from the researchers. |
| 13 | Jul 1, 2009 5:44 PM | I enjoyed the session concerning seizure mechanisms as these discussions allowed some insights into the ideas behind seizure generation |
| 14 | Jul 2, 2009 1:43 AM | No clear favorite session. |
| 15 | Jul 6, 2009 8:34 PM | I found the debates on Dynamical Issues to be quite effective; the open forum provided a quick snapshot of the various views on a given topic. |
| 16 | Jul 7, 2009 1:04 AM | Progress on medical devices |
| 17 | Jul 7, 2009 4:20 PM | seizure generation: it aligned with my work |
| 18 | Jul 8, 2009 7:50 PM | Debates on dynamical issues on sunday, I could figure out the issues more clearly |
| 19 | Jul 10, 2009 5:36 AM | All of them. |
| 20 | Jul 10, 2009 11:19 AM | Didactic course for MDs on Thursday |
| 21 | Jul 10, 2009 9:08 PM | The debates. Brief statements defined the issues to allow more focused discussion when the audience participated. A good format to help define and promote the important questions. |
| 22 | Jul 22, 2009 2:05 PM |
I very much appreciated the Contribution: Patient Perspectives |
| 23 | Jul 24, 2009 5:10 PM | The "epilepsy for non-epileptologists" provided a really excellent overview! |
| 24 | Jul 24, 2009 6:04 PM | The state of seizure prediction and Detection
It presented a current research in leading groups in the field |
| 25 | Jul 24, 2009 7:00 PM | I liked the session where two people defended opposite sides of a debates and then the audience pitched in |
| 26 | Jul 24, 2009 7:19 PM | interactive sessions |
| 27 | Jul 27, 2009 10:50 AM | seizure prediction update -- concise overview of what's going on |
| 28 | Jul 28, 2009 11:10 PM | Many were educational and enriching. |
| 29 | Jul 31, 2009 2:11 PM | The debate session. |
| 30 | Aug 5, 2009 3:32 PM | Debates |